Two points:

1. I totally misunderstood what Anthony meant, and I am sorry about that and pleased at the same time to be able to go back.

All my links contain my surname and all graphs are with my initials and surname

occasionally but not very often Vuk. etc = vuk + the rest which is not easily pronounceable.

2. Dr. Svalgaard's attitude is a bit puzzling for a scientist of enormous scientific achievements.
Many readers have noted that on WUWT and few days ago also the readers of Climate etc
http://judithcurry.com/2011/06/15/solar-snooze-discussion-thread/

experienced similar.

Acting is not my forte. Simple comment is given Shakespearian dimensions which eventually turned into a farce:

L.S. ...It crops up regularly and the purpose of pushing it is basically to say that modern science [which uses that very sensible and useful device]

is fundamentally wrong, because 'field lines don't exist'. This is not a science argument, but an attempt of credibility assassination. .

This was most hilarious thing I red in weeks.

Here is my photo as proof of my I.D.

Thank you for your attention.